Tree and Shrub List for Armenia

Partial List of Trees and Shrubs for Armenia

After the massive tree-cutting period of the early 1990s, caused by the economic blockade and the energy crisis, there was much discussion about deforestation in Armenia. During that period people were cutting trees everywhere and removing anything wooden to burn for heat!
Tree planting is the best action to take in order to mitigate deforestation and tree removal. However care must be taken not to unwittingly harm the environment. One may ask how is it possible to harm the environment by planting trees?

There are many non-Armenian tree species (non-native species), which are invasive and can aggressively occupy an area by crowding out and eventually replacing native, indigenous species of trees. Unfortunately, in Armenia, after the massive tree-cutting period of the early 1990s the planting of invasive species became a common practice, mostly due to lack of awareness of the ecological detriment that planting of invasive species can cause.

Below is a partial list of trees and shrubs which are growing in Armenia. We generally recommend planting only species that are labeled as ‘native’. Any species labeled ‘invasive’ should never be planted and actually should be removed whenever possible. These invasive species have a particular ability to produce thousands and thousands of seeds that can germinate, grow and eventually shade out native species.

There are other ecological reasons for planting only native species of plants having to do with the interactions of insects and wildlife with the plant species.

Scientific Name

Common Name

Native Habitat

Native?

Notes

Acer negundo
boxelder
USA, southern Canada
non-native
invasive
Acer platanoides
Norway maple
Europe
  
Acer pseudoplatanus
Planetree maple, Sycamore maple
Europe, western Asia (cultivated for centuries)
  
Acer tataricum
Tatarian maple
southeast Europe, western Asia
  
Acer trautvetteri
Caucasian maple
Caucasia, northern Turkey
native
 
Aesculus hippocastanum
Horsechestnut
Greece, Albania
non-native
 
Ailanthus altissima
tree of Heaven
China
non-native
extremely invasive
Albizia julibrissin
mimosa, silk tree
Iran to central China
non-native
 
Amygdalus communis
almond
Middle East
  
(Prunus dulcis)
    
Armeniaca vulgaris
apricot
Armenia
native
 
(Prunus armeniaca)
    
Betula pendula
    
     
Betula litwinowii
  
native
 
Biota orientalis
Oriental arborvitae
Korea, Manchuria, northern China
non-native
 
(Thuja orientalis)
    
Buddleia davidi
butterfly-bush
China, Japan
non-native
 
Buxus sempervirens
boxwood
southern Europe, northern Africa, western Asia
  
Caragana arborescens
Siberian peashrub
Siberia, Mongolia
  
Carpinus caucasica
Caucasian hornbeam
Europe, Caucasus
native
 
Catalpa bignonioides
catalpa
southern USA
non-native
 
Cercis siliquastrum
Judas tree
southern Europe, western Asia
non-native
 
Cornus sanguinea
European dogwood
Europe, western Asia
native
 
Cotoneaster horizontalis
rock cotoneaster
western China
non-native
 
Cydonia oblonga
quince
Caucasus
native
 
Elaeagnus angustifolia
Russian-olive
southern Europe, central Asia, 
Altai , Himalayas
native
 
Fagus orientalis
oriental beech
northwest Turkey, Caucasus, Iran
native
 
Forsythia suspensa
weeping forsythia
China
non-native
 
Fraxinus excelsior
European ash
Europe, southwestern Asia
native
 
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
USA, Canada
non-native
 
Gleditsia triachanthos
honeylocust
USA
non-native
 
Hippophae rhamnoides
seabuckthorn
Europe to China
native
 
Hibiscus syriacus
rose-of-sharon
India, China
non-native
 
Jasminum fruticans
wild jasmine
Mediterranean, Asia Minor
native
 
Junglans regia
English walnut
southeastern Europe to China
native
 
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
east and central North America
non-native
 
Koelreuteria paniculata
goldenrain tree
China, Korea, Japan
non-native
 
Ligustrum vulgare
European privet
Europe, northern Africa, southwestern Asia
native
 
Lonicera maackii
Amur honeysuckle
Manchuria, Korea
non-native
invasive
Maclura pomifera
osage orange
USA
non-native
 
Malus domestica
apple
western Asia
naturalized
naturalized nearly everywhere in the world
     
Malus orientalis
  
native
 
Melia azedarach
Chinaberry
India to China
non-native
 
Morus alba
white mulberry
China
naturalized
 
Paulownia tomentosa
empress tree
China
non-native
 
Picea orientalis
Oriental spruce
Caucasus, Asia Minor
  
Pinus brutia
Turkish pine
west of Caspian Sea to Greece
  
Pinus eldarica
Afghan pine
?Caucasus, Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan
  
     
(Pinus brutia)
    
Pinus halepensis
Aleppo pine, Jerusalem pine
Europe
non-native
 
Pinus nigra
European black pine, Austrian pine
Europe, Balkans, Crimea
non-native
 
P. n. subsp.pallasiana
European black pine
Europe to Turkey
non-native
 
Pinus pinea
stone pine
Europe, Mediterranean
non-native
 
Pinus ponderosa
ponderosa pine
western North America
non-native
 
Pistacia mutica
pistachio
Caucasus
native
 
(P.atlantica var. mutica)
    
Pistacia vera
common pistachio
western Asia
non-native
 
Platanus orientalis
Oriental planetree
southeastern Europe, western Asia
native
 
Populus alba
white poplar
southern Europe to central Asia
native
 
Prunus armeniaca
apricot
Asia
considered native
 
Prunus avium
sweet cherry
Europe, western Asia
native
 
Prunus cerasifera
cherry plum, myrobalan plum
Europe, Caucasus, western Asia
non-native
 
(Prunus mirobalan)
    
Prunus cerasus
sour cherry
Europe, southwest Asia
non-native
 
Prunus domestica
common plum
Europe, southwest Asia
non-native
 
Prunus mahaleb
rock cherry
central Europe to central Asia
native
 
Prunus persica
peach
China
non-native
 
Prunus tomentosa
Nanking Cherry
China to Japan
non-native
 
Punica granatum
pomegranate
Caucasus
native
 
Pyrus communis
European pear
Europe, western Asia
non-native
 
Pyrus caucasica
Caucasian pear
Europe, western Asia
native
 
( P. communis subsp. caucasica)
    
Pyrus demetrii
pear
Caucasus
native (globally threatened endemic species)
 
Pyrus salicifolia
willowleaf pear
southeastern Europe, western Asia
native
 
Quercus castaneifolia
chestnut-leaved oak
Caucasus, Iran
  
Quercus macranthera
Caucasian oak
Caucasus, western Asia
  
Quercus pontica
Armenian oak
Caucasus, northeastern Turkey
  
Quercus robur
english oak
Europe, Caucasus, Asia minor
non-native
 
Ribes aureum
buffalo currant
North America
non-native
 
Ribes nigrum
black currant
northern Europe, northern Asia
non-native
 
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
USA
non-native
 
     
Rosa sp.
  
native
 
Salix babylonica
Babylon weeping willow
Asia
non-native
 
Sambucus nigra
elderberry
Europe, northwest Africa, southwest Asia, western North America
native
 
Sophora Japonica
pagoda tree
China, Korea
non-native
 
Sorbus aucuparia
mountain ash
Europe, western Asia
native
 
Spiraea x vanhouttei
  
non-native
 
Symphoricarpos albus
Snowberry
USA, Canada
non-native
 
Tamarix araratica
Salt-cedar
 
native
 
Taxus baccata
English yew
Europe, northern Africa, western Asia
native
 
Thuja occidentalis
American arborvitae
eastern USA, eastern Canada
non-native
 
Ulmus laevis
European white elm
Europe to Asia
native
 
Weigelia florida
old fashioned weigela
Japan
non-native
 
Ziziphus jujube
Chinese date
southeastern Europe to Asia
native
 

Invasive Species in Armenia

Invasive species in native and non-native ranges

2007-2008

 

Armenia, ECRC/AUA

USA, University of Montana, University of California

Argentina, Universidad Nacional de La Pamba

Turkey, Adnan Menderes University

Georgia, Institute of Botany

Romania, Institute Of Biological Research

Hungary, Insttute of Ecology and Botany

 

Studying germination in the native and non-native range of a species can provide unique insights into processes of range expansion and adaptation; however, traits related to germination have rarely been compared between native and nonnative populations. In a series of common garden experiments, we explored whether differences in the seasonality of precipitation, specifically, summer drought vs summer rain, and the amount and variation of annual and seasonal precipitation affect the germination responses of populations of an annual ruderal plant, Centaurea solstitialis, from its native range and from two non-native regions with different climates. We found that seeds from all native populations, irrespective of the precipitation seasonality of the region in which they occurred, and non-native populations from regions with dry summers displayed similarly high germination proportions and rates. In contrast, genotypes from the non-native region with predominantly summer rain exhibited much lower germination fractions and rates and ecology. Organisms transported by humans to regions where they are not native (exotics) commonly face novel selective forces, which given enough genetic variation, may trigger novel evolutionary responses. The worldwide distribution of this species encompasses environments with contrasting precipitation regimes within both native and non-native ranges. Specifically, some of the regions where C. solstitialis grows are characterized by a Mediterranean-type climate with wet winters and dry summers, whereas other regions have a precipitation regime in which most of the precipitation falls during the summer, and winters are substantially drier. In all regions, the species germinates primarily in autumn (Sheley and Larson 1994, Hierro et al. 2006, L. Khetsuriani, L. Janoian and K. Andonian unpubl.); thus, winter conditions may affect its survival. Here, by conducting a series of common garden experiments in a growth chamber, we investigated whether contrasting differences in the seasonality of precipitation and changes in surrogates for environmental quality (e.g. precipitation totals) and risk (e.g. inter-annual variation in precipitation) affect germination responses of C. solstitialis populations occurring across its native range and in two climatically distinct non-native regions.                                    

inv1

General view of the experimental field in Armenia                                                                                                         

To investigate the potential effects of seasonality of precipitation on C. solstitialis germination, we conducted three successive seed collections from populations occurring in regions exepte France, Crete and Armenia, where seeds were pooled within populations. Mean cumulative germination percentages (91 SE) of pappus and non-pappus seeds of C. solstitialis populations plotted against the coefficient of variation of winter precipitation and the probability of occurring a good winter.

Pappus seeds maintained a strong association with variation in winter precipitation (r__0.91, pB0.001), but this relationship did not hold for nonpappus seeds (r__0.36, p_0.172). In addition, germination of both pappus and non-pappus seeds were no longer correlated with the probability of good winters (r_0.44, p_0.117 and r_0.11, p_0.387, respectively). Without Argentina, the association between germination proportions of pappus seeds and variation in annual precipitation improved slightly (r__0.70, p_0.017), whereas the correlation of these proportions with the probability of good years remained non-significant (r_0.39, p_0.150). Finally, as before, germination fractions of non-pappus seeds were not correlated with any of the measures of annual risk, and germination percentages of both seed morphs were not associated with any of the measures describing environmental quality (p_0.250 in all cases).

inv2Clines in these studies corresponded to variation in general climatic patterns, such as changes in climate between northern and southern latitudes (Maron et al. 2004, 2007) or between coastal versus inland environments . In contrast to these results, our comparisons based on general climatic patterns (i.e. summer drought vs summer rain) did not detect parallel clines in germination traits for populations from native and non-native ranges, as all native populations, irrespective of the climate in which they occurred, and non-native populations from the region with a summer-drought climate displayed similarly high germination proportions and rates; whereas non-native genotypes from the region with a summer rain regime exhibited much lower germination fractions and rates. On the other hand, our comparisons based on precipitation variables, which are commonly used as surrogates for environmental quality and risk, showed that for the most abundant seed morph, seeds with a pappus, germination responses of populations in both native and non-native ranges correlated strongly with ‘risk’ experienced during the winter. Specifically, and as predicted by bethedging theory, germination fractions of pappus seeds were lower in native and non-native populations experiencing greater inter-annual variation in winter precipitation (Fig. 4). For non-pappus seeds, however, this correlation was greatly influenced by non-native genotypes from central Argentina, which are from the region with the highest variation in winter precipitation of all the studied regions and exhibited the lowest proportions of germinating seeds in all our experiments (Fig. 2_4); after removing central Argentina from analyses, there was no association between germination fractions of non-pappus seeds and winter precipitation variation. Similarly, germination fractions of both pappus and non-pappus seeds correlated with probability of occurrence of good winters only in the presence of Argentinean variables. Overall, these findings suggest that rather than general climatic patterns, the degree of risk experienced at early developmental stages could exert an important control over the germination strategy of C. solstitialis populations in both native and non-native ranges. In addition, they reveal the largely unique nature among studied populations of seed germination in nonnative genotypes from central Argentina. Germination fractions of pappus seeds were also correlated with variation in annual precipitation, suggesting that overall annual risk could also play a role in the germination behavior of C. solstitialis populations. Indeed, populations experiencing comparable variation in winter precipitation in the native and non-native range tended to display similar germination fractions for this seed type . In contrast, for non-pappus seeds the link between degree of dormancy and level of winter risk does not hold when outlier Argentinean variables are removed from analyses, providing weaker support for bet-hedging across C. solstitialis populations.

inv3Several mechanisms could be responsible for the genetic differentiation in germination traits of Californian versus Argentinean populations, including coincidental introductions, genetic drift, and natural selection operating on phenotypes formed by either a novel combination of genes  or pre-adapted genotypes (i.e. the sorting-out hypothesis _ Mu¨ller-Scha¨rer and Steinger 2004; see Leger and ice 2007 for a comprehensive discussion on these mechanisms). Outcrossing plants partition most of their genetic diversity within, rather than among, populations, which increases the probability of possessing high genetic variation upon introduction because even a few immigrants can carry much of the species’ genetic variation. 

 

 

Full article available in  Oikos 118: 529_538, 2009

doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17283.x,

# 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation # 2009 Oikos

Subject Editor: Pia Mutikainen. Accepted 31 October 2008

“Germination responses of an invasive species in native and non-native ranges”

Jose´ L. Hierro, O¨zkan Eren, Liana Khetsuriani, Alecu Diaconu, Katalin To¨ro¨ k, Daniel Montesinos,

Krikor Andonian, David Kikodze, Levan Janoian, Diego Villarreal, Marı´a E. Estanga-Mollica and Ragan M. Callaway

              

Endemic Wheats of Armenia Project 2008

wheatbookArmenia, although a small country, is very rich in wild relatives of cultivars, including the ancestors and donors of such important cult ivated plants as bread cereals. The study of wild species of wheat, barley, goat grass, rye and others of the cereal crops represents a large practical interest. Progenitors of cultivars are often carriers of valuable attributes and features, such as, high drought and frost resistance, the ability to grow on relatively poor soils, and resistance to pests and disease. That is why wild relatives are valuable material for the selection of new varieties of cultivated plants. 

In addition to this, purely in practical terms, the study of wild relatives of cereal crops are of particular help in understanding the path by which many thousands of years ago the creation of the modern cultivated grasses from wild cereal crops took place, and in giving a more precise definition to the regions where the agricultural civilization arose. From that viewpoint the study of the history of domestic bread   cereals helps to shed light not only on the history of agriculture but on the history of humans in a broad sense.

Conserving the rich gene pool of wild relatives of wheat cultivars in Armenia is an urgent concern, as more and more land is disturbed by growing economic activity, land privatization, and other factors. Therefore, it is extremely important to evaluate the different Armenian populations of wheat and other cereals, and to conserve this valuable material. This can be achieved through periodic population monitoring, conservation in situ, and through collection of a seed material for preservation ex situ.

Previously, botanists have conducted numerous comprehensive studies of cereal crops, and also led archeobotanical excavations which shed light on the relatively early stages of the domestication of grasses. This current project will facilitate more comprehensive studies of the populations of wild cereal crops through the use of modern cytogenetic and molecular biology methods.